Department of Homeland Security: Katrina's Final Victim
It wasn’t a subway bomb. It wasn’t a dirty bomb. It wasn’t a hijacked plane. It wasn’t illegal immigration. It wasn’t a hostage situation in downtown
This is the first true test of a bureaucracy which can not afford to be slow in action or hesitant in response. Before the arrival of Katrina, FEMA directors and operational analysts KNEW (see Michael Brown – Bush was in Crawford for two more days) that this storm would bring havoc and destruction to the region. Unfortunately, FEMA was placed on idle during the final stages of the Hurricane preparation. Why? Because as Bush announced (8/31) in the Rose garden that Michael Chertoff is in charge. This came days after Katrina’s landfall. Consequently, orders from on high had to arrive before action could take place, action which could have saved lives.
It is important to realize that FEMA has worked well in the past. For example, Hurricane Ivan (2004) ripped through
Granted, security from terrorism, domestic as well as foreign, is a national priority, however more than one central and cumbersome department must be implemented. In effect, this administration has done what it always does; one step forward and two step back, and unfortunately a Texas Two Step will not bring rapid relief to the
Concurrently, DHS was slow to respond (National Guard is just NOW arriving to the areas) and this will cost countless lives. This is not a blame game by any stretch of the imagination; it is a situation of importance for regions that experience natural disasters. Thus, this disaster and the aftermath of DHS's slow moving bureaucracy will effect the entire country. For, the
However, the priority of this department is terrorism. I understand that terrorism is a critical security issue; yet having one central agency responsible for the entire gambit of disasters is erroneous. Unless there is another motive involved. Could the DHS amalgamation be the first steps in erasing federal disaster relief? This is not as far fetched as it may seem, some have urged for such a course of action. (see Saying No to Federal Disaster Relief by William B. Irvine) Stating that it is not the federal governments responsibility- according to the Constitution- to use any federal funds for disaster relief.
Conversely, quoting from the Constitution, “We the people of the United States in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote for the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” Just from this small introduction we find at least three references to national relief:
- General Welfare
- Secure blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity
- Insure domestic tranquility
A remedy to this situation comes straight from the OLD GOP, the dwindling Goldwater faction of the Republican Party: state funds and first responders, i.e. states rights bolstered when absolutely necessary by the federal government. The best way to insure domestic tranquility, liberty and welfare are to give citizens of the region autonomy; pure and unadulterated autonomy, during times of crisis.
This autonomy comes in the form of first responders and preventative measures which have not been given the appropriate funds during this administration. As the, “New
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home